Why the study?
Data are limited on the risk-benefit profile of ACEi and ARB therapy in patients with acute heart failure requiring hospitalization.
Does the use of ACEi/ARB reduce mortality and HF readmissions in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure?
Does the use of ACEi/ARB reduce mortality and HF readmissions in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure?
Maintaining or initiating ACEi/ARB in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure is associated with reduced mortality and readmissions, with a greater effect size in HFrEF compared to HFpEF.
Supports ACEi/ARB continuation in hospitalized HFrEF; extends observational data while leaving causal benefit open for RCTs.
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) are cornerstones in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection (HFrEF). However, there are limited data on their risk-benefit profile in patients with acute heart failure requiring hospitalizations.Methods We did a meta-analysis pooling data from all studies examining the use of ACEi/ARB in patients hospitalized for heart failure compared to patients without ACEi/ARB use. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model.Results Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Continued use of ACEi/ARBs in hospitalized patients with HFrEF was associated with lower 1-year mortality risk (pooled HR 0.68 [0.60–0.77] p < 0.001) and with lower 1–6-year mortality risk in those with heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (pooled HR 0.86 [0.78–0.94] p = 0.002). There were significant reductions in 1-year HF readmissions among hospitalized HFrEF patients (pooled HR 0.83 [0.73–0.95] p = 0.005).Conclusion Maintaining or initiating patients with HFrEF hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) on ACEi/ARB is associated with a reduce risk of mortality and 1-year admissions, but the effect size is lower among those with HFpEF with more heterogeneous outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelayo et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: