Why the study?
The risk of coronary artery disease may be increased in relatives of CAD patients, and fragmented QRS is an ECG marker showing myocardial damage.
Does having a first-degree relative with coronary artery disease associate with increased fragmented QRS count in symptomatic individuals?
Does having a first-degree relative with coronary artery disease associate with increased fragmented QRS count in symptomatic individuals?
Symptomatic individuals with first-degree relatives with coronary artery disease have higher fragmented QRS counts, suggesting early subclinical myocardial changes.
May indicate early myocardial changes in at-risk patients; leaves open whether fQRS aids risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the important causes of mortality. It has been emphasized that the risk of CAD may be increased in the relatives of CAD patients. Fragmented QRS (fQRS) is an electrocardiography (ECG) marker showing myocardial damage. METHODS: A study group of 62 symptomatic individuals (31 males, mean age 38.5 ± 7.12 years) with first-degree relatives with coronary artery disease and 64 healthy volunteers (24 males, mean age 37.9 ± 11.6 years) were included in this study. The study did not include those with known cardiac disease, metabolic disease, or drug use that may cause a change in ECG parameters. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding gender, heart rate, QRS complex, QTc, frontal QRS-T angle, and left ventricle ejection fraction. Compared to the control group, the QT interval and fQRS count were significantly higher in the study group (p < .05 for both). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin, and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (p < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that fQRS was increased in individuals with symptomatic first-degree relatives with coronary artery disease compared to healthy volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abuş et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: