Key result
Global work efficiency assessed via left ventricular pressure-strain loop was superior to global longitudinal strain for detecting early subclinical myocardial injury in SLE patients (AUC 0.804).
Why the study?
The authors aimed to investigate the feasibility of quantitatively assessing left ventricular myocardial work in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using a left ventricular pressure-strain loop.
Does left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LVPSL) derived global work efficiency (GWE) improve the early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS)?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
Does left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LVPSL) derived global work efficiency (GWE) improve the early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS)?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.804
Noninvasive global work efficiency derived from left ventricular pressure-strain loops is a more sensitive marker than global longitudinal strain for detecting early subclinical myocardial injury in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
May support earlier detection of subclinical injury in SLE; extends GLS comparisons but leaves open prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive myocardial work (MW) is a new technology which is based on strain after considering the load influence on myocardial deformation. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of quantitatively assessing left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LVPSL). METHODS: 76 patients with SLE were included in the study (A), further divided into two subgroups according to the presence of lupus nephritis (LN). Global longitudinal strain (GLS), peak strain dispersion (PSD), global myocardial work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE) were obtained. RESULTS: 1: Patients with SLE demonstrated a significantly reduced GWE and GLS compared with control group, GWW and PSD were increased, above changes were more pronounced in patients with LN. There was no significant difference in GWI and GCW. 2: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that GWE was the most powerful tool for detecting myocardial insufficiency early in SLE patients, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.804, and was superior to GLS (AUC = 0.707). GWE remains the best indicator of subclinical myocardial injury in patients with LN. The AUC was 0.910, and the best cutoff point was 96.5% (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 73.3%). CONCLUSIONS: LVPSL can be used to noninvasively assess changes in MW in patients with SLE. Noninvasive GWE is a more sensitive index than GLS to detect subclinical myocardial injury early in SLE patients. This is a potential valuable clinical tool to assist in the early-find myocardial damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Systemic lupus erythematosus (n=76). Left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LVPSL) vs. Control group was evaluated on Detection of early myocardial insufficiency (AUC 0.804). Global work efficiency assessed via left ventricular pressure-strain loop was superior to global longitudinal strain for detecting early subclinical myocardial injury in SLE patients (AUC 0.804).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: