Key result
Predilatation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significantly lower rate of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (sub-HR 0.42), mainly driven by a reduction in moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Why the study?
VARC-3 criteria recently redefined bioprosthetic valve dysfunction after TAVI, but its rate in current practice is scarcely reported.
Does predilatation and valve design/size predict bioprosthetic valve dysfunction after TAVI?
Cohort (n=514)
No
Does predilatation and valve design/size predict bioprosthetic valve dysfunction after TAVI?
Predilatation during TAVI, particularly in small annuli, is associated with a lower rate of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, whereas small balloon-expandable valves increase the risk.
Background: Recently, the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria redefined bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the rate of BVD is scarcely reported in current practice. Aims: We aimed to evaluate the rate and predictors of BVD after TAVI based on the VARC-3 criteria. Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients who had undergone TAVI using single-centre data. BVD was reported as exposure-adjusted event rates with a patient-year unit (per 100 patient-years). Predictors of BVD after TAVI were analysed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression to account for the competing risk of death. Results: or perimeter <72 mm) tended to benefit from predilatation (p for interaction=0.03). The same regression model also demonstrated that a small balloon-expandable valve (BEV; ≤23 mm) was associated with a higher rate of BVD (adjusted sub-HR 2.46, 95% CI: 1.38-4.38). Conclusions: Our study suggested that the rate of BVD in patients undergoing TAVI is relatively low at midterm follow-up. Predilatation, particularly in small annuli and small BEV might have an impact on BVD, mainly caused by moderate or severe PPM, after TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hioki et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=514). Predilatation vs. No predilatation was evaluated on Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) (sub-HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.88, p=0.02). Predilatation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significantly lower rate of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (sub-HR 0.42), mainly driven by a reduction in moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: