Why the study?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve NT-proBNP, PAI-1, echocardiographic parameters, and lipid profiles in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve NT-proBNP, PAI-1, echocardiographic parameters, and lipid profiles in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Losartan and ramipril demonstrate equal efficacy in modulating NT-proBNP levels, echocardiographic parameters, PAI-1 activity, and lipid profiles in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports interchangeable use of ramipril or losartan post-STEMI; confirms equivalent effects on biomarkers and remodeling.
This study investigated the effect of 8 weeks of treatment with ramipril or losartan on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity, echocardiographic parameters and lipid profiles in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomly assigned to receive up to 10 mg/day ramipril (n = 27) or up to 100 mg/day losartan (n = 26). No significant differences in any of the tested variables were observed between the two treatment groups, either before or after treatment. Within the losartan-treated group a significant decrease in levels of NT-proBNP (211.1 +/- 211.5 versus 94.7 +/- 150.1 pg/ml), total cholesterol (5.7 +/- 1.0 versus 4.6 +/- 1.1 mmol/l), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (3.5 +/- 0.9 versus 2.7 +/- 1.0 mmol/l) was observed after treatment compared with baseline. Thus, after an acute MI, losartan seems equal to ramipril in terms of the NT-proBNP levels, echocardiographic parameters, PAI-1 activity and lipid profiles that were achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinšek et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: