Why the study?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve markers of heart failure, endogenous fibrinolysis, and platelet aggregation in STEMI patients after PPCI?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve markers of heart failure, endogenous fibrinolysis, and platelet aggregation in STEMI patients after PPCI?
Ramipril and losartan exert similar long-term effects on heart failure markers and fibrinolysis in STEMI survivors, and both enhance the antiplatelet effect of DAPT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ramipril and losartan appear interchangeable post-STEMI; confirms long-term equivalence on HF and fibrinolysis markers in this RCT.
INTRODUCTION: Blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients prevents heart failure and recurrent thrombosis. Our aim was to compare the effects of ramipril and losartan upon the markers of heart failure, endogenous fibrinolysis, and platelet aggregation in STEMI patients over the long term. METHODS: After primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), 28 STEMI patients were randomly assigned ramipril and 27 losartan, receiving therapy for six months with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We measured N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), ejection fraction (EF), plasminogen-activator-inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), and platelet aggregation by closure times (CT) at the baseline and after six months. RESULTS: Baseline NT-proBNP ≥ 200 pmol/mL was observed in 48.1% of the patients, EF < 55% in 49.1%, and PAI-1 ≥ 3.5 U/mL in 32.7%. Six-month treatment with ramipril or losartan resulted in a similar effect upon PAI-1, NT-proBNP, EF, and CT levels in survivors of STEMI, but in comparison to control group, receiving DAPT alone, ramipril or losartan treatment with DAPT significantly increased mean CT (226.7 ± 80.3 sec versus 158.1 ± 80.3 sec, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril and losartan exert a similar effect upon markers of heart failure and endogenous fibrinolysis, and, with DAPT, a more efficient antiplatelet effect in long term than DAPT alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinšek et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: