Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind trial shows short-term symptom relief from cisapride in non-ulcer dyspepsia with prepyloric changes, indicating that therapeutic benefits diminish after two weeks.
One hundred and twenty consecutive outpatients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and erosive prepyloric changes (EPC) were, after a 2-week placebo run-in period, randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with either 10-mg cisapride tablets or placebo three times daily for 4 weeks. The patients' global evaluation and total symptom score were significantly in favour of cisapride at 2 weeks (p less than 0.05). At 4 weeks the effect of cisapride was no longer significant (p = 0.22). Similarly, the investigators' global evaluation showed marked to moderate symptom improvement in 47% of the cisapride-treated patients as compared with 30% of the placebo-treated patients at 2 weeks. The 95% confidence interval of the difference (18%) was 0% to 35%. At 4 weeks the intergroup difference was only 10% (cisapride, 50% versus placebo 40%). Pain on awakening was the only symptom improved in favour of cisapride at 4 weeks. Thus, when patients with NUD and EPC are treated with cisapride, the therapeutic gain might vanish after the 2nd week of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hausken et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: