Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This paper aims to provide a conceptual framework explaining how organizations can satisfy individuals’ identity motives by enacting family orientation (FO) cues. The framework introduces family logics as the interpretive mechanism through which organizational members translate FO cues into perceived modes of need-satisfaction, regardless of whether the firm is a family firm. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on social identity theory (SIT), the research conceptualized FO as organizational-level cues that can support six identity motives (self-esteem, continuity, distinctiveness, belongingness, efficacy and meaning). Because SIT emphasizes that early-life group experiences in family systems shape how individuals interpret group cues, the authors posit that family-group experiences hold meaningful perspectives for the way individuals engage with other important systems, such as organizations. Findings FO dimensions can function as actionable organizational cues, regardless of firms’ family orientation. When those cues are interpreted through family logics, they increase perceived identity motive satisfaction, which strengthens identification and downstream outcomes. Originality/value Prior approaches emphasize either organizational practices or individual needs in isolation. By specifying a cue-interpretation-motive-satisfaction mechanism and mapping FO dimensions to identity motives, the family logic framework provides a novel bridge that family firm insights make available to all organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: