Why the study?
Patients with T2DM face an increased risk of HFpEF, a condition lacking effective treatments, prompting investigation into metabolic and vascular biomarkers for diagnostic and therapeutic use.
The pathogenesis of HFpEF differs by diabetes status, with inflammatory pathways predominating in diabetic patients, highlighting the need for tailored therapeutic approaches.
May inform diabetes-stratified HFpEF research; leaves open whether pathway differences guide therapy.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally. People living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have up to three times higher risk of developing CVD, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), for which there is no effective treatment. The need for tangible interventions has led to investigations into a number of biomarkers associated with metabolic and vascular dysfunction that could be utilised for diagnostic and treatment purposes. This review discusses the importance and mechanisms of inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers, which have shown the most potential in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of HFpEF, particularly in the presence of diabetes. In depth “in silico” analysis was also carried out to identify pathogenic pathways associated with HFpEF, both in the presence and absence of diabetes. The results identified mostly inflammatory pathways associated with HFpEF in the presence of diabetes, and a number of pathways related to angiogenesis, remodelling, metabolism as well as inflammation, in the absence of diabetes. The shared and unique pathways identified in HFpEF in the presence and absence of diabetes, should be explored further in order to improve management and outcomes of people living with HFpEF, taking into the account other underlying conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: