Why the study?
Does a novel 32-mL subcutaneous counterpulsation device improve acute hemodynamics compared to a standard 40-mL IABP in a calf model of hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure?
Does a novel 32-mL subcutaneous counterpulsation device improve acute hemodynamics compared to a standard 40-mL IABP in a calf model of hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure?
A novel 32-mL subcutaneous counterpulsation device provides equivalent or superior acute hemodynamic support compared to a standard 40-mL IABP in a preclinical model of impaired hemodynamics.
Animal data support advancing CPD to human trials; leaves open comparative efficacy versus IABP in clinical heart failure.
The miniaturization of mechanical assist devices and less invasive implantation techniques may lead to earlier intervention in patients with heart failure. As such, we evaluated the effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive, implantable counterpulsation device (CPD) in augmenting cardiac function during impaired hemodynamics. We compared the efficacy of a 32-mL stroke volume CPD with a standard 40-mL intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) over a range of clinically relevant pathophysiological conditions. Male calves were instrumented via thoracotomy, the CPD was anastomosed to the left carotid artery, and the IABP was positioned in the descending aorta. Hemodynamic conditions of hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure were pharmacologically simulated and data were recorded during CPD and IABP support (off, 1:2, 1:1 modes) for each condition. In all three pathophysiological conditions, the CPD and IABP produced similar and statistically significant (P < 0.05) increases in coronary artery blood flow normalized to the left ventricular (LV) workload. During hypotension and heart failure conditions, however, the CPD produced significantly greater reductions in LV workload and myocardial oxygen consumption as compared with the IABP. A novel 32-mL CPD connected to a peripheral artery produced equivalent or greater hemodynamic benefits than a standard 40-mL IABP during pharmacologically induced hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartoli et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: