Why the study?
Infections involving cardiovascular implantable electronic devices are rising and increasingly complex to manage, creating a clinical need for more accurate diagnostic tests.
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately confirm or rule out infection in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately confirm or rule out infection in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
This review discusses the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing complex cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.
May aid diagnosis of complex CIED infections; leaves open prospective validation of accuracy.
Infections involving cardiovascular implantable electronic devices are becoming increasingly common, and increasingly complex to manage. Advances in technology have made implantable electronic devices smaller, and easier to implant, and patients are now also more likely to be older, with more complex comorbidities. Infections related to these devices are, however, not decreasing, and in some settings, these are rising. There is a clinical need for more accurate tests for confirming or ruling out infected devices. In this article, we review the relevant literature and share our own initial experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhoil et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: