Key result
The ACURATE neo self-expanding transcatheter heart valve is reviewed regarding its technical details, clinical outcomes, and comparative data with other next-generation valves for aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Next-generation transcatheter heart valves such as the self-expanding ACURATE neo have been developed to minimize TAVR complications, warranting a review of technical details, clinical outcomes, and comparative data.
This review summarizes the technical features and clinical evidence for the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
Consolidates evidence on ACURATE neo for aortic stenosis; leaves open need for randomized comparative trials.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and is now standard of care for high surgical risk patients and a valid alternative strategy in intermediate risk patients. Recently, TAVR has shown excellent results in low-risk patients, indicating an imminent extension toward this population. Improvements in procedural outcomes are the result of increasing operator experience, sophisticated imaging for procedural planning but also due to the continuous evolution of transcatheter heart valves developed to minimize procedural complications. 'Next-generation' valves are currently available, among them the self-expanding ACURATE neo. Here, the technical details and clinical outcomes of the ACURATE neo are reviewed, comparative data with other 'next-generation' valves and potential advantages and disadvantages are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guelker et al. (2021) conducted a review in Aortic Stenosis. ACURATE neo Aortic Valve System vs. Other next-generation valves was evaluated. The ACURATE neo self-expanding transcatheter heart valve is reviewed regarding its technical details, clinical outcomes, and comparative data with other next-generation valves for aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: