Key result
AMULET telecare reduces HF hospitalisation or CV death by ~31% vs. standard care.
Why the study?
Prevention of heart failure hospitalisations and deaths is a major therapeutic aim, but the role of telemedicine in this context remains equivocal.
Does an outpatient telecare model based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments and remote cardiologist decisions reduce the risk of unplanned HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with HF (LVEF ≤49%) after an acute HF episode?
RCT (n=605)
Open-label
Computerised permuted block technique
Yes
Does an outpatient telecare model based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments and remote cardiologist decisions reduce the risk of unplanned HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with HF (LVEF ≤49%) after an acute HF episode?
An outpatient telecare model utilizing nurse-led non-invasive assessments and remote cardiologist decisions significantly reduces the risk of unplanned HF hospitalizations in patients with recent acute heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports nurse-led telecare post-acute HF with LVEF ≤49%; confirms telemedicine benefit where prior evidence was equivocal.
AIM: Prevention of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations and deaths constitutes a major therapeutic aim in patients with HF. The role of telemedicine in this context remains equivocal. We investigated whether an outpatient telecare based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments supporting remote therapeutic decisions (AMULET telecare) could improve clinical outcomes in patients after an episode of acute HF during 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective randomised controlled trial, patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤49%, after an episode of acute HF within the last 6 months, were randomly assigned to receive either an outpatient telecare based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments (n = 300) (AMULET model) or standard care (n = 305). The primary composite outcome of unplanned HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death occurred in 51 (17.1%) patients in the telecare group and 73 (23.9%) patients in the standard care group up to 12 months after randomization [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.99; P = 0.044]. The implementation of AMULET telecare, as compared to standard care, reduced the risk of first unplanned HF hospitalisation (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.91; P = 0.015) as well as the risk of total unplanned HF hospitalisations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; P = 0.044).There was no difference in cardiovascular mortality between the study groups (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54-1.67; P = 0.930). CONCLUSIONS: AMULET telecare as compared to standard care significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death during 12-month follow-up among patients with HF and LVEF ≤49% after an episode of acute HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzesiński et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure (n=605). AMULET telecare (outpatient telecare based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments supporting remote therapeutic decisions) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Composite of first unplanned heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99, p=0.044). AMULET telecare reduced the risk of first unplanned heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular death by 31% (HR 0.69) compared to standard care in patients with heart failure and LVEF ≤49%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: