Key result
On-treatment systolic BP of 135-144 mmHg (vs 115-124 mmHg) increased the composite risk of cardiovascular events, kidney failure, and mortality in CKD patients with proteinuria.
Why the study?
The optimal treatment blood pressure target in chronic kidney disease remains unclear, and whether intensive blood pressure-lowering benefits are comparable between CKD and non-CKD patients is debated.
Does intensive blood pressure lowering reduce the composite risk of major cardiovascular events, kidney failure, and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to non-CKD patients?
Cohort (n=359,492)
Yes
Does intensive blood pressure lowering reduce the composite risk of major cardiovascular events, kidney failure, and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to non-CKD patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This nationwide cohort study supports a systolic blood pressure target of ≤130 mmHg for CKD patients with proteinuria and ≤140 mmHg for those without proteinuria to minimize cardiovascular and renal risks.
BACKGROUND: The treatment blood pressure (BP) target in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, and whether the benefit of intensive BP-lowering is comparable between CKD and non-CKD patients is debated. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Information Database, 359 492 CKD patients who had received antihypertensives regularly were identified from 12.1 million participants of nationwide health screening. The composite risk of major cardiovascular events, kidney failure and all-cause mortality was assessed according to time-averaged, on-treatment systolic BP. RESULTS: Over a 9-year follow-up, the composite outcome was noted in 18.4% of 239 700 participants with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 18.9% of 155 004 with dipstick albuminuria. The thresholds of systolic BP, above which the composite risk increased significantly, in the reduced eGFR and the proteinuric population were 135 mmHg and 125 mmHg, respectively. For all-cause mortality, the respective thresholds were 145 mmHg and 135 mmHg. When comparing the composite risk between propensity score-matched groups, the hazard ratios of on-treatment BP of systolic 135-144 mmHg (reference, 115-124 mmHg) in the reduced eGFR and non-CKD pairs were 1.18 and 0.98, respectively (P = 0.13 for interaction), and those in the proteinuria and non-CKD pairs were 1.30 and 1.01, respectively (P = 0.003 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the recommendation that, based on office BP, the systolic target in CKD with proteinuria is ≤130 mmHg, and the target in CKD with no proteinuria is ≤140 mmHg. The benefit of intensive BP-lowering may be greater in CKD patients, particularly those with proteinuria, than in their non-CKD counterparts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hae Hyuk Jung (2021) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (n=359,492). On-treatment systolic blood pressure 135-144 mmHg vs. On-treatment systolic blood pressure 115-124 mmHg was evaluated on Composite risk of major cardiovascular events, kidney failure and all-cause mortality (HR 1.30, p=0.003 for interaction). On-treatment systolic BP of 135-144 mmHg (vs 115-124 mmHg) increased the composite risk of cardiovascular events, kidney failure, and mortality in CKD patients with proteinuria.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: