Key result
The SUR-VAPES 3 trial will randomize 20 smokers with coronary artery disease to a single electronic vaping cigarette or heat-not-burn cigarette to assess acute changes in coronary flow reserve.
Why the study?
Modified risk products such as electronic vaping cigarettes and heat-not-burn cigarettes may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet, and vascular effects in symptomatic coronary artery disease.
Does a single electronic vaping cigarette compared to a heat-not-burn cigarette differentially affect coronary flow reserve in traditional combustible cigarette smokers with intermediate coronary stenosis?
RCT (n=20)
1:1
Does a single electronic vaping cigarette compared to a heat-not-burn cigarette differentially affect coronary flow reserve in traditional combustible cigarette smokers with intermediate coronary stenosis?
The SUR-VAPES 3 trial is designed to evaluate the acute pathophysiologic impact of electronic vaping versus heat-not-burn cigarettes on coronary flow reserve in smokers with established coronary artery disease.
Acute CFR effects of vaping vs heat-not-burn remain untested in CAD smokers; RCT will provide first direct comparison.
BACKGROUND: Traditional combustible cigarette (TCC) smoking remains a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) may be safer than TCC but may still have detrimental oxidative, platelet and vascular effects of particular importance to people with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We aimed to compare the acute coronary, systemic and environmental effects of two leading MRP in 20 TCC smokers admitted for invasive coronary assessment of CAD and willing to quit or after prior failed quitting attempts. After confirmation at angiography of an intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be appraised. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to use a single EVC or a single HNBC in the catheterization laboratory, followed by repeat CFR measurement. The primary endpoint will be the change in CFR before and after product use. Quantitative coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) will also be measured. RESULTS: We expected to accrue results able to: 1) test whether MRP have in general a detrimental impact on coronary vascular function in TCC smokers; 2) test whether EVC have a different impact than HNBC on coronary function; 3) provide ancillary pathophysiologic and translational insights on the acute risk and safety profile of MRP in TCC smokers with established cardiovascular disease, including complex correlations between coronary, cardiac, systemic and environmental effects. In addition, by directly informing participants of their individual results, they will be further empowered to quit TCC. CONCLUSIONS: The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking (SUR-VAPES) 3 trial will provide important insights into the pathophysiologic cardiovascular impact of EVC and HNBC, also suitable to inform patients and individualize their smoking cessation strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biondi‐Zoccai et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=20). Electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) vs. Heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) was evaluated on Change in coronary flow reserve (CFR) before and after product use. The SUR-VAPES 3 trial will randomize 20 smokers with coronary artery disease to a single electronic vaping cigarette or heat-not-burn cigarette to assess acute changes in coronary flow reserve.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: