Why the study?
Does positive longitudinal pre-ejectional velocity (+PEVL) accurately identify the transmural extent of viable myocardium in patients with recent reperfused MI?
Does positive longitudinal pre-ejectional velocity (+PEVL) accurately identify the transmural extent of viable myocardium in patients with recent reperfused MI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Positive longitudinal pre-ejectional velocity (+PEVL) measured by tissue Doppler imaging is not a reliable marker for predicting the transmural extent of viable myocardium in recent reperfused MI.
BACKGROUND: Positive longitudinal pre-ejectional velocity (+PEVL) was recently reported to be a reliable index of myocardial recovery early after successful revascularization in myocardial infarction (MI); that is, it recognizes the transmural extent of viable myocardium. The applicability of PEVL in the real-world clinical setting for identifying the transmural extent of viable myocardium in reperfused recent MI was assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using tissue Doppler imaging, the resting basal and mid myocardial PEVLs were determined within 3 days after revascularization in 41 consecutive patients with recent MI. Infarct thickness was semi-quantified using delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and at 6-month follow up to differentiate transmural from nontransmural MI. The proportion of segments showing the presence of +PEVL was not significantly changed as infarct thickness increased (p=0.2), with 66.2% having +PEVL even in segments involving >75% transmural infarction. Moreover, +PEVL was found in a large fraction of segments with akinesia (70.4%). Specificity and negative predictive value of +PEVL for assessing infarct nontransmurality were disappointingly low (32.0% and 26.9%, respectively). All of these results were not altered when the 6-month follow-up MRI was done. CONCLUSIONS: +PEVL cannot be regarded as a reliable marker for predicting the transmural extent of viable myocardium in recent MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: