Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, we propose InterAxNN , an energy-aware approximate hardware architecture to perform vector-matrix multiplications in the binary precision regime for energy-constrained intermittently powered systems (IPS). In contrast to existing XNOR multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations implemented widely for binary neural networks (BNNs), we design a novel reconfigurable XNOR-MAC and AND-MAC memory macro to perform approximate binary precision operations, targeted for systems with extreme energy constraints. The proposed macro design is integrated with the ability to modify the MAC mode during run-time depending on instantaneous energy and power transients. We utilize the unique attributes of ferroelectric transistors (FeFETs) to implement the proposed ultra-low power BNN engine performing in-memory computing for artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. Subsequently, we leverage the quality configurable compute-in-memory-based hardware accelerator to implement InterAxNN based on a TI MSP430-based microcontroller. We evaluate the proposed InterAxNN concerning two baselines: (a) standard von Neumann computing architecture-based-microcontroller platform (MCU), and (b) MCU with a state-of-the-art low energy accelerator (MCU+LEA), and observe significant performance and energy benefits. Experimental results performed using a TI MSP430FR5379 IPS system show 448×–581× uplift in forward progress for 2%–8% accuracy loss for MNIST, 4%–5% accuracy loss for EMNIST, and 1%–4% reduction in accuracy for QMNIST, respectively, using MLP on a MCU+LEA platform with Unified NVM architecture. The AND-MAC mode in InterAxNN results in 91×–127× amount of additional forward progress over XNOR-MAC for 1%–2%, 4%–19%, and 1%–5% higher quality degradation for MNIST, EMNIST, and QMNIST, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: