Why the study?
Does rituximab improve clinical and histological outcomes in a patient with refractory acute cardiac humoral rejection?
Does rituximab improve clinical and histological outcomes in a patient with refractory acute cardiac humoral rejection?
Rituximab may be an effective therapeutic option for acute cardiac humoral rejection that is resistant to standard immunosuppression and plasmapheresis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support rituximab consideration in refractory humoral rejection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Humoral or antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplant recipients is mediated by donor-specific cytotoxic antibodies and is histologically defined by linear deposits of immunoglobulin and complement in the myocardial capillaries. Antibody-mediated rejection often is accompanied by hemodynamic compromise and is associated with reduced long-term graft survival. Standard immunosuppression, designed to target T cell immune function, is largely ineffective against this B cell-driven process. Current treatment options for humoral rejection are limited by a lack of specific anti-B cell therapies. We present the case of a 50-year-old woman with hemodynamically significant humoral rejection resistant to steroids, cyclophos-phamide, and plasmapheresis who responded to the addition of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (rituximab). One year posttransplant, the patient is rejection-free, with normal left ventricular systolic function and coronary arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aranda et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: