Why the study?
High-intensity interval training delays heart rate and oxygen uptake kinetics, but how these responses compare between exercise and recovery phases across various cycling protocols remained to be characterized.
Does the recovery phase of HIIT protocols maintain similar heart rate and oxygen uptake compared to the exercise phase in healthy active individuals?
Does the recovery phase of HIIT protocols maintain similar heart rate and oxygen uptake compared to the exercise phase in healthy active individuals?
Heart rate and oxygen uptake remain elevated during recovery from HIIT, indicating a sustained cardiovascular load comparable to the exercise phase.
HIIT recovery sustains HR and VO2 at exercise levels; leaves open safety and efficacy implications for clinical populations.
Background: Increases in maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) occur with high-intensity interval training (HIIT), partially due to an extended duration spent at or near maximal V̇O2 or heart rate (HRmax). HIIT induces a delay in HR and V̇O2 during exercise, leading to consistently high HR/V̇O2 values in recovery between intervals. Purpose: This study compared the V̇O2 and HR response between exercise and recovery to various cycling HIIT protocols using data from seven prior studies. Methods: Healthy, active men and women (N = 104, age and V̇O2max 24 ± 5 yr and 40 ± 7 mL/kg/min) underwent HIIT protocols having different durations (30–60 s), intensities (70–85 percent of maximal workload (%Wmax), and recovery periods (10–75 s). V̇O2, HR, and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were assessed. Results: Across studies, peak HR was equal to 90.7 ± 6.2% HRmax. Results showed no significant difference in mean HR (159 ± 14 vs. 160 ± 15 b/min, p = 0.48) or V̇O2 (1.97 ± 0.47 vs. 1.98 ± 0.48 L/min, p = 0.82) between exercise and recovery. Conclusions: These data show elevated V̇O2 and HR during recovery from HIIT, suggesting a substantial, sustained load on the cardiovascular system in recovery from interval exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Astorino et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: