Coronary reperfusion and clinical outcomes after thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from the HORIZONS‐AMI trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of coronary reperfusion and long-term clinical outcomes of patients enrolled in the HORIZONS-AMI trial according to the use of thrombus aspiration (TA). BACKGROUND: The impact of manual TA on microvascular perfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is unsettled. METHODS: In this retrospective, nonrandomized, subgroup analysis, the authors evaluated thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, tissue myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), ST-segment resolution (STR), net adverse clinical events (NACE), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing pPCI with or without manual TA. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients had pPCI with upfront TA, and 2,917 patients had pPCI without TA. Patients who had TA were more likely to have TIMI 0/1 flow at baseline (75.1% vs. 63.7%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the rates of final TIMI 3 flow (90.2% vs. 92.3%, P = 0.19) or dynamic TMPG 2-3 (77.4% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.68). STR ≥70% was similar in both groups at 60 minutes but higher in the TA group at discharge (71.8% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.02). After multivariable adjustment, TA did not predict MACE at 30 days (HR 0.96 [0.51-1.80], P = 0.90), 1 year (HR 1.03 [0.68-1.55], P = 0.89), or 3 years (HR 1.13 [0.86-1.48], P = 0.39). Stent thrombosis did not differ at 1 year or 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, the use of manual TA was associated with improved STR at discharge, but not with any difference in final TIMI flow, TMPG, or MACE.