Why the study?
Does left cervical sympathetic trunk transection affect renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized rats?
Does left cervical sympathetic trunk transection affect renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized rats?
Cervical sympathetic trunk transection does not cause a compensatory increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity in rats, suggesting that sympathetic excitation during stellate ganglion blockade in humans may be due to local anesthetic infiltration to adjacent nerves.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No compensatory RSNA increase after left cervical sympathetic trunk transection in rats; leaves open mechanisms of sympathetic excitation during human stellate ganglion blockade.
Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) with a local anesthetic increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity in the tibial nerve in humans. However, whether this sympathetic excitation in the tibial nerve is due to a sympathetic blockade in the neck itself, or due to infiltration of a local anesthetic to adjacent nerves including the vagus nerve remains unknown. To rule out one mechanism, we examined the effects of cervical sympathetic trunk transection on renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in anesthetized rats. Seven rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal urethane. RSNA together with arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded for 15 min before and 30 min after left cervical sympathetic trunk transection. The baroreceptor unloading RSNA obtained by decreasing arterial blood pressure with administration of sodium nitroprusside was also measured. Left cervical sympathetic trunk transection did not have any significant effects on RSNA, baroreceptor unloading RSNA, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. These data suggest that there was no compensatory increase in RSNA when cervical sympathetic trunk was transected and that the increase in sympathetic nerve activity in the tibial nerve during SGB in humans may result from infiltration of a local anesthetic to adjacent nerves rather than a sympathetic blockade in the neck itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeda et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: