Key result
First morning void urine samples yielded a microalbuminuria prevalence of 7.5%, closely matching the 10.0% prevalence from 24-hour collections, whereas spot urine samples overestimated it at 25.4% (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does measurement of albuminuria in a first morning void provide a more reliable alternative to 24-h urine collection than a spot urine sample?
Population
241 participants of a prospective cohort study
Comparison
Measurement of urinary albumin concentration or… vs 24-h urine collection (gold standard)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
First morning void may reduce microalbuminuria misclassification versus spot samples in practice; extends validation to observational cohorts.
Observational (n=241)
No
Does measurement of albuminuria in a first morning void provide a more reliable alternative to 24-h urine collection than a spot urine sample?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.18
Measurement of albuminuria in a first morning void, preferably as the albumin:creatinine ratio, is a more reliable alternative to 24-h urine collection than spot urine samples.
Witte et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Microalbuminuria (n=241). First morning void urine sample vs. 24-hour urine collection (gold standard) and spot urine sample was evaluated on Prevalence of microalbuminuria (p=0.18). First morning void urine samples yielded a microalbuminuria prevalence of 7.5%, closely matching the 10.0% prevalence from 24-hour collections, whereas spot urine samples overestimated it at 25.4% (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: