Key result
Diastolic stress testing identifies subclinical HF in ~79% of asymptomatic type 2 diabetes patients.
Why the study?
Few studies have assessed the incremental value of diastolic stress for detecting subclinical heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Does diastolic stress testing improve the detection of subclinical heart failure in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to resting echocardiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=186)
No
Does diastolic stress testing improve the detection of subclinical heart failure in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to resting echocardiography?
Diastolic stress testing provides incremental value over resting echocardiography for detecting subclinical heart failure and impaired exercise capacity in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes.
May support diastolic stress testing to unmask subclinical HF in asymptomatic T2DM; extends resting echo data but remains hypothesis-generating.
AIMS: Resting echocardiography is a valuable method for detecting subclinical heart failure (HF) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, few studies have assessed the incremental value of diastolic stress for detecting subclinical HF in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Asymptomatic patients with Type 2 DM were prospectively enrolled. Subclinical HF was assessed using systolic dysfunction (left ventricular longitudinal strain <16% at rest and <19% after exercise in absolute value), abnormal cardiac morphology, or diastolic dysfunction (E/e' > 10). Metabolic equivalents (METs) were calculated using treadmill speed and grade, and functional capacity was assessed by percent-predicted METs (ppMETs). Among 161 patients studied (mean age of 59 ± 11 years and 57% male sex), subclinical HF was observed in 68% at rest and in 79% with exercise. Among characteristics, diastolic stress had the highest yield in improving detection of HF with 57% of abnormal cases after exercise and 45% at rest. Patients with revealed diastolic dysfunction during stress had significantly lower exercise capacity than patients with normal diastolic stress (7.3 ± 2.1 vs. 8.8 ± 2.5, P < 0.001 for peak METs and 91 ± 30% vs. 105 ± 30%, P = 0.04 for ppMETs). On multivariable modelling found that age (beta = -0.33), male sex (beta = 0.21), body mass index (beta = -0.49), and exercise E/e' >10 (beta = -0.17) were independently associated with peak METs (combined R2 = 0.46). A network correlation map revealed the connectivity of peak METs and diastolic properties as central features in patients with DM. CONCLUSION: Diastolic stress test improves the detection of subclinical HF in patients with diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishi et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=186). Diastolic stress test (exercise echocardiography) vs. Resting echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of subclinical heart failure. Diastolic stress testing improved the detection of subclinical heart failure in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes, identifying abnormalities in 79% of patients during exercise compared to 68% at rest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: