Key result
Lower implantation of a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve in an in vitro model resulted in approximately 8% higher turbulent intensity compared to a higher implantation position.
Why the study?
Turbulence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation may impair long-term valve performance and durability, and characterizing this flow can help improve implantation techniques.
Does the implantation position of a transcatheter aortic valve affect the structure and intensity of turbulent flow in an in-vitro aortic root model?
Does the implantation position of a transcatheter aortic valve affect the structure and intensity of turbulent flow in an in-vitro aortic root model?
Lower implantation of a transcatheter aortic valve in an in-vitro model leads to reduced stent expansion, a smaller orifice area, and increased turbulent flow intensity, which may negatively impact long-term valve durability.
Lower TAVR implantation may increase turbulence and affect durability; leaves open optimal positioning pending clinical data.
The development of turbulence after transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation may have detrimental effects on the long-term performance and durability of the valves. The characterization of turbulent flow generated after TAV implantation can provide fundamental insights to enhance implantation techniques. A self-expandable TAV was tested in a pulse replicator and the three-dimensional flow field was extracted by means of tomographic particle image velocimetry. The valve was fixed inside a silicone phantom mimicking the aortic root and the flow field was studied for two different supra-annular axial positions at peak systole. Fluctuating velocities and turbulent kinetic energy were compared between the two implantations. Velocity spectra were derived at different spatial positions in the turbulent wakes to characterize the turbulent flow. The valve presented similar overall flow topology but approximately 8% higher turbulent intensity in the lower implantation. In this configuration, axial views of the valve revealed smaller opening area and more corrugated leaflets during systole, as well as more accentuated pinwheeling during diastole. The difference arose from a lower degree of expansion of the TAV's stent inside the aortic lumen. These results suggest that the degree of expansion of the TAV in-situ is related to the onset of turbulence and that a smaller and less regular opening area might introduce flow instabilities that could be detrimental for the long-term performance of the valve. The present study highlights how implantation mismatches may affect the structure and intensity of the turbulent flow in the aortic root.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietrasanta et al. (2022) studied Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Lower supra-annular axial implantation of self-expandable TAV vs. Higher supra-annular axial implantation was evaluated on Turbulent intensity and flow topology. Lower implantation of a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve in an in vitro model resulted in approximately 8% higher turbulent intensity compared to a higher implantation position.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: