Why the study?
Does the positioning of a transcatheter aortic valve affect fluid dynamics in an in vitro valve-in-valve model?
Does the positioning of a transcatheter aortic valve affect fluid dynamics in an in vitro valve-in-valve model?
In vitro fluid dynamics suggest that deploying a transcatheter aortic valve as close to the native annulus as possible optimizes blood residence time and wall stresses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro positioning data are hypothesis-generating; leaves open optimal valve-in-valve deployment pending clinical studies.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a novel treatment for severe aortic valve stenosis. Due to the recent use of this technology and the procedural variability, there is very little data that quantify the hemodynamic consequences of variations in valve placement. Changes in aortic wall stresses and fluid retention in the sinuses of Valsalva can have a significant effect on the clinical response a patient has to the procedure. By comprehensively characterizing complex flow in the sinuses of Valsalva using digital particle image velocimetry and an advanced heart-flow simulator, various positions of a deployed transcatheter valve with respect to a bioprosthetic aortic valve (valve-in-valve) were tested in vitro. Displacements of the transcatheter valve were axial and directed below the simulated native valve annulus. It was determined that for both blood residence time and aortic Reynolds stresses, it is optimal to have the annulus of the transcatheter valve deployed as close to the aortic valve annulus as possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groves et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: