Key result
Epicardial adipose tissue volume was significantly higher in patients with coronary artery disease compared to those without (85.81 vs 68.38 cm³), demonstrating moderate diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the relationship of CAD with EAT volume and hepatosteatosis using multidetector computed tomography.
Does epicardial adipose tissue volume and hepatosteatosis predict coronary artery disease in patients referred for MDCT?
Observational (n=96)
No
Does epicardial adipose tissue volume and hepatosteatosis predict coronary artery disease in patients referred for MDCT?
Absolute Event Rate: 85.81% vs 68.38%
p-value: p=0.0119
Epicardial adipose tissue volume is higher in patients with coronary artery disease but has lower diagnostic accuracy than coronary calcium score and does not correlate with hepatosteatosis or calcium score.
Background: In this study, the relationship of CAD (coronary artery disease) with EAT (epicardial adipose tissue) volume and hepatosteatosis were investigated by using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Material and Method: EAT (Epicardial Adipose Tissue) volume, CCS (coronary calcium score) and CT density of liver (CTDL) were measured by using 64-detector computed tomography in 96 patients who were clinically referred for the evaluation of CAD. The relationship between EAT volume, CCS, CTDL and their effectiveness in detecting coronary heart disease were investigated. Data analysis was done with MedCalc (Version 9.6.2.0) package program. Results: CCS (AUC=0.866) and EAT volume (AUC=0.672) were significantly effective in determination of CAD. The diagnostic accuracy of CCS in detecting CAD was higher than of EAT volume. EAT volume was higher in patients with CAD (85.81±34.51 cm³), compared to patients without CAD (68.38±29.23 cm³) (P=0.0119). CTDL in patients with CAD (58.74±12.22 HU) was significantly lower than in patients without CAD (63.02±8.93) (P=0.0553). There was no statistically significant relationship between EAT volume and CCS (r=0.1620, P=0.1148), EAT volume and CTDL (r=0.0046, P=0.9648), and CCS and CTDL (r=0.0109, P=0.9162). Conclusion: There was no relationship between EAT volume, CTDL and CCS. EAT volume is higher in patients with CAD than in patients without CAD. EAT volume had moderate but lower diagnostic power than CCS, to determine CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ata et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=96). Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume measurement vs. Patients without CAD was evaluated on Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume (cm³) (p=0.0119). Epicardial adipose tissue volume was significantly higher in patients with coronary artery disease compared to those without (85.81 vs 68.38 cm³), demonstrating moderate diagnostic accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: