Why the study?
Does singles tennis competition elicit higher heart rate intensities compared to doubles competition in male tennis players?
Does singles tennis competition elicit higher heart rate intensities compared to doubles competition in male tennis players?
Singles tennis provides sufficient cardiovascular stimulus to meet ACSM criteria for developing fitness, whereas doubles tennis does not.
Singles tennis may meet ACSM intensity thresholds for fitness unlike doubles; cross-sectional data leaves open long-term cardiorespiratory benefits.
AbstractIn brief: The heart rates of 17 male tennis players (aged 18 to 44, mean 31.4 ± 7.3 years) were monitored during singles and doubles competition. The purposes were to compare average heart rate intensities of players during singles and doubles competition, and to document the amount of time spent in continuous activity. In a one-hour singles match, subjects reached an average of 61% of their maximal heart rate reserve (MHRR), whereas in doubles competition they averaged only 33%. The authors concluded that singles competition in tennis meets the MHRR intensity criteria established by the American College of Sports Medicine for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory fitness. However, doubles competition does not meet those criteria and should not be considered as an exercise regimen for developing fitness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgans et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: