Why the study?
Does ventricular APD restitution slope or ERP/APD ratio predict mortality or ICD shock in patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does ventricular APD restitution slope or ERP/APD ratio predict mortality or ICD shock in patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy?
Ventricular APD restitution slope and ERP/APD ratios do not provide long-term prognostic value for mortality or ICD shocks in patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, challenging the clinical utility of the restitution hypothesis in this population.
Does not support restitution parameters for risk stratification in cardiomyopathy; challenges the restitution hypothesis in this observational cohort.
BACKGROUND: An action potential duration (APD) restitution curve with a steep slope ≥1 has been associated with increased susceptibility for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. We aimed to evaluate the "restitution hypothesis" and tested ventricular APD restitution slope as well as effective refractory period (ERP)/APD ratio for long-term prognostic value in patients with ischemic (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monophasic action potentials were recorded in patients with ICM (n = 32) and DCM (n = 42) undergoing routine programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 32±7% and 28±9%, respectively. APD and ERP were measured at baseline stimulation (S(1)) and upon introduction of one to three extrastimuli (S(2)-S(4)). ERP/APD ratios and the APD restitution curve were calculated and the maximum restitution slope was determined. After a mean follow-up of 6.1±3.0 years, the combined end-point of mortality and and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock was not predicted by restitution slope or ERP/APD ratios. Comparing S(2) vs. S(3) vs. S(4) extrastimuli for restitution slope (1.5±0.6 vs. 1.4±0.4 vs. 1.3±0.5; p = NS), additional extrastimuli did not lead to a steepening restitution slope. ERP/APD ratio decreased with additional extrastimuli (0.98±0.09 [S(1)] vs. 0.97±0.10 [S(2)] vs. 0.93±0.11 [S(3)]; p = 0.03 S(1) vs. S(3)). Positive PVS was strongly predictive of outcome (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Neither ventricular APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios predict outcome in patients with ICM or DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorenkamp et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: