Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the potential of using oral fluid as a non-invasive diagnostic material in patients with myocardial infarction.
Can high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I be detected in the oral fluid of patients with acute myocardial infarction and does it correlate with serum levels?
Can high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I be detected in the oral fluid of patients with acute myocardial infarction and does it correlate with serum levels?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable non-invasive MI troponin testing; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical adoption.
Aim . To assess the potential of using oral fluid as a non-invasive diagnostic material in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Material and methods . The pilot, single-center, prospective study included 47 patients with documented MI, among whom there were 33 men (71%) and 14 women (29%) (mean age, 61,72±12,09 years). All patients successfully treated with reperfusion therapy. The control group consisted of 15 people in whom MI was not confirmed. The concentration of high-sensitivity cardiac tro -ponin I ( hs-cTnI) in blood and oral fluid was determined using chemilumines -cence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) on a PATHFAST analyzer (LSI Medience Corporation). Medium sensitivity cardiac troponin I (ms-cTnI) was determined in blood using an Access 2 immunoassay system analyzer (Beckman Coulter, USA). Levels of total bilirubin, creatinine, glucose, rheumatoid factor, alkaline phosphatase and other biochemical parameters were determined on a Furuno CA-400 analyzer (Japan). Results . The levels of hs-cTnI in patients with MI were significantly higher than in healthy patients both in blood (8,73±1,17 ng/ml vs 0,012±0,03 ng/ml, p<0,001) and oral fluid (0,41±0,11 ng/ml vs 0,004±0,001 ng/ml, p<0,001). In patients with-AMI, there was a moderate correlation between the concentration of hs-cTnI in the serum and the oral fluid (r=0,319; p<0,05). The serum level of hs-cTnI in patients with Q-wave (n=33) and non-Q-wave (n=14) MI was 10,11±1,53 ng/ ml vs 5,48±1,29 ng/ml, respectively (p=0,025). The oral fluid concentration of hs-cTnI in patients with W-wave (n=33) and non-Q-wave (n=14) MI was 0,42±0,14 ng/ml vs 0,40±0,16 ng/ml, respectively (p=0,925). The serum level of hs-cTnI in anterior MI (n=19) was 8,92±2,06 ng/ml vs 8,91±1,81 ng/ml in posterior one (n=23) (p=0,997). The concentration of hs-cTnI in the oral fluid was 0,21±0,06 ng/ml vs 0,57±0,21 ng/ml, respectively (p=0,107). The oral fluid concentrations of hs-TnI in patients with MI using conventional plastic tubes (n=26) and special Sarstedt microtubes (n=21) were 0,56±0,19 ng/ml and 0,22±0,10 ng/ml, respectively (p=0,12). Conclusion. This pilot study has proven the possibility of detecting hs-cTnI in the oral fluid of patients with MI. There was a moderate correlation between the level of hs-cTnI in blood serum and oral fluid. Further research is needed to determine the hs-cTnI reference values in the oral fluid of patients with MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaulin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: