Why the study?
Does the AT1-receptor antagonist TCV-116 improve left ventricular geometry and function in a rat model of pressure-overload hypertrophy?
Does the AT1-receptor antagonist TCV-116 improve left ventricular geometry and function in a rat model of pressure-overload hypertrophy?
The AT1-receptor antagonist TCV-116 dose-dependently attenuates myocyte width and length in pressure-overload hypertrophy, reducing wall stress and preserving cardiac output.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dose-dependent remodeling in rat models; leaves open translation to clinical pressure-overload hypertrophy.
The goal of this study was to examine the effect of an angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 )-receptor antagonist (TCV-116) on left ventricular (LV) geometry and function during the development of pressure-overload LV hypertrophy. A low (LD; 0.3 mg ⋅ kg −1 ⋅ day −1 ) or a high (HD; 3.0 mg ⋅ kg −1 ⋅ day −1 ) dose of TCV-116 was administered to abdominal aortic-banded rats over 4 wk, and hemodynamics and morphology were then evaluated. In both LD and HD groups, peak LV pressures were decreased to a similar extent compared with the vehicle-treated group but stayed at higher levels than in the sham-operated group. In the LD group, both end-diastolic wall thickness (3.08 ± 0.14 mm) and myocyte width (13.3 ± 0.1 μm) decreased compared with those in the vehicle-treated group (3.67 ± 0.19 mm and 15.3 ± 0.1 μm, respectively; both P < 0.05). In the HD group, myocyte length was further decreased (HD: 82.6 ± 2.6, LD: 94.1 ± 2.9 μm; P < 0.05) in association with a reduction in LV midwall radius (HD: 3.36 ± 0.12, LD: 3.60 ± 0.14 mm; P < 0.05) and peak midwall fiber stress (HD: 69 ± 8, LD: 83 ± 10 × 10 3 dyn/cm 2 ; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output among all groups. The AT 1 -receptor antagonist TCV-116 induced an inhibition of the development of pressure-overload hypertrophy. Morphologically, not only the width but also the length of myocytes was attenuated with TCV-116, leading to a reduction of midwall radius and hence wall stress, which in turn may contribute to a preservation of cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obayashi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: