Why the study?
Does TCV-116 reduce myocardial remodeling and growth factor expression in Angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats?
Does TCV-116 reduce myocardial remodeling and growth factor expression in Angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats?
TCV-116 ameliorates myocardial remodeling in Ang II-induced hypertensive rats independently of blood pressure reduction, likely by decreasing ET-1 and PDGF A-chain expression.
No immediate clinical implications for hypertension; leaves open translation of remodeling effects from Ang II rat models to humans.
Angiotensin II (Ang II) has been shown to stimulate cardiac growth and collagen synthesis in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and to increase fibroblast proliferation. Chronic infusion with Ang II increases blood pressure and activates growth mechanisms to produce hypertrophy of the heart. This study investigated the effects of an Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist, TCV-116, on preproendothelin-1 (preproET-1), ETA receptor and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) A-chain expression in the left ventricle of Wistar-Kyoto rats treated for 2 weeks with Ang II (200 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)), and the relation of these effects to myocardial remodeling. Rats given Ang II alone (ANGII-V) were compared with rats also receiving TCV-116 (ANGII-TCV). In both groups, blood pressure was similar and significantly higher than in control rats. The preproET-1, ET(A) receptor and PDGF A-chain expressions in the left ventricle were significantly increased in ANGII-V compared with control rats, and were significantly suppressed in ANGII-TCV compared with ANGII-V rats. ANGII-V rats showed a significant increase of the type I collagen expression, wall-to-lumen ratio, perivascular fibrosis, and myocardial fibrosis, with all these parameters being significantly improved by TCV-116. Myocardial remodeling in Ang II-induced hypertensive rats was significantly ameliorated by a subdepressor dose of TCV-116, which may have been due to a decrease in ET-1 and PDGF A-chain expression in the left ventricle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hara et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: