Why the study?
Does oral oxyfedrine improve symptomatic relief and ECG responses to exercise compared to isosorbide dinitrate and placebo in patients with ischaemic heart disease and angina pectoris?
Does oral oxyfedrine improve symptomatic relief and ECG responses to exercise compared to isosorbide dinitrate and placebo in patients with ischaemic heart disease and angina pectoris?
Oxyfedrine is more efficacious and better tolerated than isosorbide dinitrate for the treatment of angina pectoris in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Oxyfedrine may warrant consideration for angina; confirms superiority over isosorbide dinitrate in RCT.
1 In a group of 23 patients with documented ischaemic heart disease who experienced angina pectoris, oral oxyfedrine (24 mg three times daily) was compared with isosorbide dinitrate (10 mg three times daily) and placebo in a double-blind double-crossover clinical trial. 2 Isosorbide dinitrate appeared no better than placebo, either in terms of symptomatic relief or ECG responses to exercise. Thirty eight per cent of patients complained of headaches and 28% had to cease taking the drug for this reason. 3 Oxyfedrine produced statistically significant improvements in both symptom level (P < 0.01) and ECG ST-segment responses to exercise (P < 0.01). The only side effect noted was a reversible loss of taste sensation by one patient. 4 Neither drug produced any adverse changes in any haematological or biochemical parameters. 5 Oxyfedrine is, therefore, to be preferred to isosorbide dinitrate, being both much better tolerated and more efficacious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whittington et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: