Why the study?
Cardiomyopathy and myocardial fibrosis have been described in female carriers of dystrophin gene mutations, but assessment of myocardial fibrosis using CMR T1 native mapping and ECV in asymptomatic carriers had not been published.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with T1 native mapping and extracellular volume assessment detect diffuse myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy compared to healthy controls?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with T1 native mapping and extracellular volume assessment detect diffuse myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy compared to healthy controls?
In asymptomatic female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with normal LVEF, CMR-derived T1 native relaxation time and extracellular volume do not significantly differ from healthy controls, suggesting an absence of detectable diffuse myocardial fibrosis at this stage.
No T1/ECV differences detected in asymptomatic DMD carriers with preserved LVEF; cross-sectional data leave open fibrosis timing and longitudinal utility.
Background Female carriers of dystrophin gene mutations (DMD-FC) were previously considered non-manifesting, but in recent decades, cardiomyopathy associated with muscular dystrophy and myocardial fibrosis has been described. Our study aimed to assess prospectively myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic DMD-FC compared to a sex- and age-matched control group (CG) using T 1 native mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. To our knowledge, this approach has not been published yet. Material and methods 38 DMD-FC (mean age 39.1 ± 8.8 years) and 22 CG (mean age 39.9 ± 12.6 years) were included. Using CMR, T 1 native relaxation time and ECV were determined in each group. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was assessed in all cases. Results T 1 native relaxation time was similar for DMD-FC and CG (1005.1 ± 26.3 ms vs 1003.5 ± 25.0 ms; p-value = 0.81). Likewise, the global ECV was also similar between the groups (27.92 ± 2.02% vs 27.10 ± 2.89%; p-value = 0.20). The segmental analysis of ECV according to the American Heart Association classification did not show any differences between DMD-FC and CG. Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in the global T 1 native relaxation time and global or segmental ECV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masárová et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: