PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1980Journal of Applied Physiology71 citations

Positive end-expiratory pressure shifts left ventricular diastolic pressure-area curves

View Full Paper
JHJ. B. HaynesSCSA CarsonWWW. P. Whitney

Structured PICO

Does positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) alter left ventricular diastolic pressure-area characteristics in a canine model?

P
Population
9 dogs with radiopaque markers inserted into a plane of the left ventricle
I
Intervention
Ventilation with 15 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
C
Comparator
Ventilation with zero end-expiratory pressure
O
Outcome
Shift in mean polynomial curves derived from diastolic pressure-area datasurrogate

PEEP-induced reductions in cardiac output are likely due to a decrease in preload (altered LV diastolic pressure-area characteristics) rather than decreased contractility.

Abstract

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation is frequently associated with reduction in cardiac output despite unchanged transmural left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure. These findings have been interpreted to indicate decreased contractility, but could also be explained by altered LV diastolic pressure-volume characteristics. To study this possibility, radiopaque markers were inserted into a plane of the LV in nine dogs. Transmural pressure (LV-pericardial) was synchronized with LV area during ventilation with zero end-expiratory pressure and with 15 cmH2O PEEP. Mean polynomial curves derived from the diastolic pressure-area data demonstrated that PEEP shifted the curves upward so that a given diastolic area was associated with a higher transmural LV pressure (P less than 0.0001). PEEP decreased end-diastolic area and stroke area, both of which were normalized with dextran volume expansion. Restoration of stroke area by normalizing end-diastolic area with volume expansion suggests the initial changes with PEEP were due to a decrease in preload rather than in contractility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haynes et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ec1adae66660099a44831https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.670
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on right and left ventricular performance.1980 · 106 citations
  2. 2Mechanism of Reduced Cardiac Output during Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in the Dog1989 · 74 citations
  3. 3Effect of PEEP on left ventricular function in right-heart-bypassed dogs1981 · 46 citations
  4. 4Dimensional analysis of the left ventricle during PEEP: relative septal and lateral wall displacements1984 · 55 citations
  5. 5Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Left and Right Ventricular Diastolic Filling Assessed by Transoesophageal Doppler Echocardiography1999 · 18 citations