Key result
Vagotomy reduced the dynamic gain of the transfer function from carotid sinus pressure to heart rate at 1 Hz (P<0.001), whereas beta-blockade reduced the dynamic gain at 0.01 Hz (P=0.020).
Why the study?
A head-to-head comparison of the open-loop dynamic characteristics of the total baroreflex arc from baroreceptor pressure input to heart rate response had not been performed.
This preclinical study demonstrates that vagal control dominates high-frequency heart rate dynamics (1 Hz) while sympathetic control dominates low-frequency dynamics (0.01 Hz) in the baroreflex arc of rats.
Vagal high-frequency and sympathetic low-frequency baroreflex control distinguished in rats; extends mechanistic insight but leaves open human translation.
Although heart rate (HR) is governed by the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, a head-to-head comparison of the open-loop dynamic characteristics of the total arc from a baroreceptor pressure input to the HR response has yet to be performed. We estimated the transfer function from carotid sinus pressure input to the HR response ( H CSP→HR ) before and after bilateral vagotomy ( n = 7) as well as before and after the administration of a β-blocker propranolol ( n = 8) in anesthetized male Wistar-Kyoto rats. The carotid sinus pressure was perturbed according to a Gaussian white noise signal so that the input power spectra were relatively flat between 0.01 and 1 Hz. The gain plot of H CSP→HR was V-shaped. Vagotomy reduced the dynamic gain at 1 Hz (0.0598 ± 0.0065 to 0.0025 ± 0.0004 beats·min −1 ·mmHg −1 , P < 0.001) but not at 0.01 or 0.1 Hz. β-Blockade reduced the dynamic gain at 0.01 Hz (0.247 ± 0.069 to 0.077 ± 0.017 beats·min −1 ·mmHg −1 , P = 0.020) but not at 0.1 or 1 Hz. We also estimated the efferent limb transfer function from electrical vagal efferent stimulation to the HR response ( H VN→HR ) under β-blockade conditions. We associated the model parameters of H VN→HR with the mean HR and the standard deviation of HR so that H VN→HR could be estimated based only on the HR data. We finally estimated the neural arc transfer function from a pressure input to efferent vagal nerve activity by dividing H CSP→HR by H VN→HR . The mathematically determined vagal neural arc showed derivative characteristics with its phase near zero radians at the lowest frequency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawada et al. (2019) studied Baroreflex-mediated heart rate control (n=15). Bilateral vagotomy and beta-blocker propranolol vs. Before intervention (baseline) was evaluated on Transfer function from carotid sinus pressure input to the HR response (dynamic gain). Vagotomy reduced the dynamic gain of the transfer function from carotid sinus pressure to heart rate at 1 Hz (P<0.001), whereas beta-blockade reduced the dynamic gain at 0.01 Hz (P=0.020).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: