Why the study?
Does acute hypoxemia alter norepinephrine clearance and sympathetic nervous system activity in healthy young men?
Does acute hypoxemia alter norepinephrine clearance and sympathetic nervous system activity in healthy young men?
Acute hypoxemia activates the sympathetic nervous system, but the expected rise in plasma norepinephrine is attenuated due to a concurrent increase in norepinephrine clearance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Increased NE clearance during hypoxemia may blunt plasma NE rise despite sympathetic activation; leaves open relevance in cardiovascular disease.
Acute hypoxemia leads to activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), yet adrenergic vasoconstriction does not occur and venous plasma norepinephrine (NE) fails to rise as expected. To examine whether this dissociation between SNS tone and plasma NE is due to altered metabolism of NE, we measured arterial NE kinetics ([3H]NE infusion technique) and sympathetic nervous outflow to muscle (peroneal microneurography) during 25-30 min of hypoxemia (spontaneous breathing, mean O2 saturation 74%) in six healthy young men. During hypoxemia, muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) rose significantly from 12.2 +/- 3.3 to 18.6 +/- 3.5 bursts/min, and the total amplitude increased from 123 +/- 36 to 255 +/- 50 mm/min. NE spillover, an index of NE release at the sympathetic nerve terminals, rose from 1.66 +/- 0.30 to 2.33 +/- 0.40 nmol.min-1.m-2 (P = 0.014). However, NE clearance increased also from 0.99 +/- 0.05 to 1.19 +/- 0.11 l.min-1.m-2 (P = 0.014), and arterial NE rose from 281 +/- 50 to 339 +/- 64 pg/ml (P = 0.023). Hypoxemia resulted in a significant rise in forearm blood flow and a decrease in forearm vascular resistance. The fact that skin blood flow and vascular resistance did not change implies that forearm vasodilation was localized to skeletal muscle. Our results suggest that during acute hypoxemia in humans the SNS is activated but the rise in plasma NE is attenuated because NE clearance is increased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leuenberger et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: