Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many biologists and statisticians still have questions about analysis of resource selection data. Consequently, we compared 4 statistical methods for analysis of habitat selection by considering hypotheses, assumptions, and methods of calculation. We used detailed calculations on gray partridge (Perdix perdix) habitat-use data to note factors that may cause the methods to give disparate results. The factors we identified where the emphasis or relative weight placed on within- versus between-animal observations, independence and variability assumptions, and the relationship between the statistical hypothesis and the biological hypothesis
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alldredge et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: