Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that it is possible to bring the social sciences into evolutionary focus without being committed to a thesis the author calls ontological reductionism, which is a widespread predilection for lower-level explanations. After showing why we should reject ontological reductionism, the author argues that there is a way to construe cultural evolution that does justice to the autonomy of social science explanations. This paves the way for a liberal approach to explanation the author calls explanatory pluralism, which allows for the possibility of explaining cultural phenomena in terms of different evolutionary processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean Lachapelle (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: