Key result
Patients classified as low-risk by the acute heart failure index had a 1.7% rate of inpatient death or serious outcomes, compared to 8.5% in higher-risk patients.
Why the study?
Does the acute heart failure index (AHFI) accurately identify patients presenting to the emergency department with decompensated heart failure at low risk of early life-threatening events?
Cohort (n=259)
No
Does the acute heart failure index (AHFI) accurately identify patients presenting to the emergency department with decompensated heart failure at low risk of early life-threatening events?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs 8.5%
The acute heart failure index (AHFI) prospectively identified a low-risk subgroup of emergency department patients with decompensated heart failure who had a very low rate (1.7%) of early life-threatening events.
May support AHFI for ED risk stratification in decompensated HF; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The acute heart failure index (AHFI) is a previously derived prediction rule to identify patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) with decompensated heart failure (DHF) at low risk of early life-threatening events. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To validate the AHFI prospectively. METHODS: Using a prospective cohort study, adult patients presenting to an urban university hospital ED with DHF were included. Data on 21 variables were gathered to calculate the AHFI. Primary endpoints included inpatient death and non-fatal serious outcomes (myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, intubation, or cardiac reperfusion). Secondary endpoints included death from any cause or readmission for heart failure within 30 days. Primary and secondary endpoint rates were calculated with 95% CI for the low and higher-risk subgroups. RESULTS: 259 patients were enrolled. 245/259 (95%) were admitted. 60/259 (23%) met low-risk criteria, of whom 1/60 (1.7%, CI 0.04 to 8.9) was discharged after sustaining pulseless electrical activity arrest. The comparable primary outcome rate in the derivation study was 1.4% (CI 1.1 to 1.7). 17/199 (8.5%, CI 5.1 to 13.3) higher-risk patients experienced an endpoint, compared with 13.3% (CI 12.9 to 13.7) in the derivation cohort. One low-risk patient (1.7%, CI 0.04 to 8.9) died within 30 days, and five (8.3%, CI 2.8 to 18.4) were readmitted. Corresponding rates in the derivation study were 2% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with those previously reported for the low-risk subgroup of the AHFI. Further research is needed to determine the impact, safety and full range of generalisability of the AHFI as an adjunct to decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsiao et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Decompensated heart failure (n=259). Acute heart failure index (AHFI) low-risk classification vs. AHFI higher-risk classification was evaluated on Inpatient death and non-fatal serious outcomes (myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, intubation, or cardiac reperfusion). Patients classified as low-risk by the acute heart failure index had a 1.7% rate of inpatient death or serious outcomes, compared to 8.5% in higher-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: