Key result
Strengthen exercises reduced systolic blood pressure by a mean difference of 6.02 mmHg compared to usual care in adults with prehypertension.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the potential short-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions on prehypertensive individuals to inform future community-based management.
Do non-pharmacological interventions reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults with prehypertension?
Meta-Analysis (n=8,279)
Do non-pharmacological interventions reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults with prehypertension?
Mean Difference: -6.02 (95% CI -8.16–-3.87)
Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly strengthen exercises and relaxation, provide significant short-term blood pressure reduction in prehypertensive patients.
Strengthening exercises support SBP reduction in prehypertension; extends network meta-analysis evidence for non-pharmacological interventions.
Background: This study aims to compare the potential short-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on prehypertensive people, and provide evidence for intervention models with potential in future community-based management. Methods: In this Bayesian network meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science were screened up to 16 October 2021. Prehypertensive patients (systolic blood pressure, SBP 120-139 mmHg/diastolic blood pressure, DBP 80-89 mmHg) with a follow-up period longer than 4 weeks were targeted. Sixteen NPIs were identified during the scope review and categorized into five groups. Reduction in SBP and DBP was selected as outcome variables and the effect sizes were compared using consistency models among interventions and intervention groups. Grade approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Thirty-nine studies with 8,279 participants were included. For SBP, strengthen exercises were the most advantageous intervention group when compared with usual care (mean difference = -6.02 mmHg, 95% CI -8.16 to -3.87), and combination exercise, isometric exercise, and aerobic exercise were the three most effective specific interventions. For DBP, relaxation was the most advantageous intervention group when compared with usual care (mean difference = -4.99 mmHg, 95% CI -7.03 to -2.96), and acupuncture, meditation, and combination exercise were the three most effective specific interventions. No inconsistency was found between indirect and direct evidence. However, heterogeneity was detected in some studies. Conclusion: NPIs can bring short-term BP reduction benefits for prehypertensive patients, especially exercise and relaxation. NPIs could potentially be included in community-based disease management for prehypertensive population once long-term real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are proven. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=151518, identifier: CRD42020151518.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Prehypertension (n=8,279). Strengthen exercises vs. Usual care was evaluated on Reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -6.02, 95% CI -8.16 to -3.87). Strengthen exercises reduced systolic blood pressure by a mean difference of 6.02 mmHg compared to usual care in adults with prehypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: