Key result
Essential hypertension was associated with a significantly lower 24-hour closed-loop baroreflex feedback gain (1.75 vs 3.33 ms/mmHg) compared to normotensive subjects.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare modulations of feedback and feedforward couplings between blood pressure and heart rate over 24 hours in normotensive versus hypertensive subjects using closed-loop baroreflex models in ambulatory conditions.
Does hypertension alter the circadian modulations of feedback and feedforward couplings in the baroreflex cardiac arm?
Observational (n=16)
No
Does hypertension alter the circadian modulations of feedback and feedforward couplings in the baroreflex cardiac arm?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.75% vs 3.33%
p-value: p=<0.05
Closed-loop models of blood pressure and heart rate interactions can detect circadian alterations in feedforward gain and derangements of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension that are missed by traditional open-loop approaches.
Supports closed-loop baroreflex modeling to detect hypertension-related autonomic changes missed by open-loop methods; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
Closed-loop models of the interactions between blood pressure (BP) and heart rate variations allow for estimation of baroreflex sensitivity (feedback effects of BP changes on heart rate) while also considering the feedforward effects of heart rate on BP. Our study is aimed at comparing modulations of feedback and feedforward couplings over 24 hours in normotensive and hypertensive subjects, by assessing closed-loop baroreflex models in ambulatory conditions. Continuous intra-arterial BP recordings were performed for 24 hours in 8 normotensive and 8 hypertensive subjects. Systolic BP (SBP) and pulse interval (PI) beat-by-beat series were analyzed by an autoregressive moving average model over consecutive 6-minute running windows, estimating closed-loop feedback and feedforward gains in each window. The open-loop feedback gain was estimated for comparison. Normotensive and hypertensive patients were compared during wake (18:00-22:00) and sleep (23:00-5:00) periods by a mixed-effect linear model at p<0.05. In both groups feedback (feedforward) gain averaged values were higher (lower) in sleep than in wake. Moreover, the closed-loop feedback gainwas higher in normotensive subjects both in wake and sleep, whereas the closed-loop feedforward gain was higher in hypertensive subjects during sleep. By contrast, no significant differences were found between the normotensive and hypertensive groups for the open-loop feedback gain. Therefore, the closed-loop SBP-PI model can detect circadian alterations in the feedforward gain of PI on SBP and derangements of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension not detectable with the open-loop approach. These findings may help to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of the autonomic dysfunction underlying hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parati et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension (n=16). Essential hypertension vs. Normotension was evaluated on 24-hour closed-loop baroreflex feedback gain (αC) (p=<0.05). Essential hypertension was associated with a significantly lower 24-hour closed-loop baroreflex feedback gain (1.75 vs 3.33 ms/mmHg) compared to normotensive subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: