Why the study?
Does physiological dual chamber pacing with optimized AV delay improve hemodynamics and clinical course in a patient with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and first-degree AV block?
Does physiological dual chamber pacing with optimized AV delay improve hemodynamics and clinical course in a patient with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and first-degree AV block?
In a patient with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and first-degree AV block, optimizing AV delay using a DDD pacemaker improved myocardial function and clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AV optimization in end-stage DCM with first-degree AV block; leaves open need for prospective trials before broader adoption.
I report a case of end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy with first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, which had been resistant to intensive medical therapy and was eventually treated by DDD pacemaker. The optimal AV interval setting was decided using invasive right-heart catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. At a pacing rate of 92/minute, an AV interval setting of between 200 and 100 msec increased left ventricular filling and enhanced myocardial contractility. An AV interval setting of 50 msec increased the left ventricular filling further. However, this resulted in deteriorated left ventricular function. Based on these findings, the pacemaker was programmed at an optimal AV delay of 100 msec, a rate of 82-150 beats/min and a DDD mode, resulting in a good clinical course for 4 months after the therapy. Thus, it is suggested that in patients with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and first-degree AV block, an optimal AV delay setting using a DDD pacemaker can improve deteriorated myocardial function probably by increasing the left ventricular filling, and thus promote utility of the Frank-Starling mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajime Kataoka (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: