Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyze a multiple‐activity, principal‐agent model in which the activities are naturally substitutable for the agent and complementary for the principal. A basic result is that the optimal compensation must cause the agent to view the activities as complements. This complementarity is achieved by employing a compensation scheme that is typically nonmonotone and makes success on multiple dimensions the sole source of large rewards. A number of empirical implications follow, along with explanations for some existing empirical findings. We also discuss applications to compensation in specific occupations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacDonald et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: