PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 5, 2016European Heart Journal353 citationsOpen Access

Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial

View Full Paper
KKKarl-Heinz KuckAFAlexander FürnkranzKCK. R. Julian Chun

Key Result

Cryoballoon ablation resulted in significantly fewer repeat ablations (11.8% vs 17.6%, P=0.03) and all-cause rehospitalizations (32.6% vs 41.5%, P=0.01) compared to radiofrequency ablation.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=750)

Structured PICO

Does cryoballoon catheter ablation reduce reinterventions and rehospitalizations compared to radiofrequency current catheter ablation in patients with drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
750 patients with drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation followed for 1000 days.
I
Intervention
Cryoballoon catheter ablation
C
Comparator
Radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation
O
Outcome
Reinterventions, rehospitalizations, and quality-of-life over 1000 days of follow-up

Cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF is associated with significantly fewer repeat ablations and rehospitalizations compared to radiofrequency ablation, with similar improvements in quality of life.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 11.8% vs 17.6%

p-value: p=0.03

Abstract

AIMS: The primary safety and efficacy endpoints of the randomized FIRE AND ICE trial have recently demonstrated non-inferiority of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation in patients with drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the current study was to assess outcome parameters that are important for the daily clinical management of patients using key secondary analyses. Specifically, reinterventions, rehospitalizations, and quality-of-life were examined in this randomized trial of cryoballoon vs. RFC catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (374 subjects in the cryoballoon group and 376 subjects in the RFC group) were evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat cohort. After the index ablation, log-rank testing over 1000 days of follow-up demonstrated that there were statistically significant differences in favour of cryoballoon ablation with respect to repeat ablations (11.8% cryoballoon vs. 17.6% RFC; P = 0.03), direct-current cardioversions (3.2% cryoballoon vs. 6.4% RFC; P = 0.04), all-cause rehospitalizations (32.6% cryoballoon vs. 41.5% RFC; P = 0.01), and cardiovascular rehospitalizations (23.8% cryoballoon vs. 35.9% RFC; P < 0.01). There were no statistical differences between groups in the quality-of-life surveys (both mental and physical) as measured by the Short Form-12 health survey and the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire. There was an improvement in both mental and physical quality-of-life in all patients that began at 6 months after the index ablation and was maintained throughout the 30 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RFC ablation had significantly fewer repeat ablations, direct-current cardioversions, all-cause rehospitalizations, and cardiovascular rehospitalizations during follow-up. Both patient groups improved in quality-of-life scores after AF ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01490814.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuck et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=750). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation was evaluated on repeat ablations (p=0.03). Cryoballoon ablation resulted in significantly fewer repeat ablations (11.8% vs 17.6%, P=0.03) and all-cause rehospitalizations (32.6% vs 41.5%, P=0.01) compared to radiofrequency ablation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205cd6e6386eb04298f799https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw285
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation2015 · 273 citations
  2. 2The cost-utility of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and critical appraisal of economic evaluations2013 · 28 citations
  3. 3Approaches to Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation2015 · 2,333 citations
  4. 4Quantification of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden with an Implantable Pacemaker Before and After Pulmonary Vein Isolation2004 · 41 citations
  5. 5Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation2016 · 1,953 citations