Key result
The Biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stent reduced the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis (HR 0.70) compared to a bare metal stent in complex PCI patients.
Why the study?
Does a polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stent improve safety and efficacy compared to a bare metal stent in high bleeding risk patients undergoing complex PCI?
RCT (n=2,413)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does a polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stent improve safety and efficacy compared to a bare metal stent in high bleeding risk patients undergoing complex PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.7 (95% CI 0.49–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.2% vs 21.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
In high bleeding risk patients undergoing complex PCI, a polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stent with 1-month DAPT maintained superior safety and efficacy compared to a bare metal stent.
Supports polymer-free Biolimus A9 stent with 1-month DAPT over bare metal in high-bleeding-risk complex PCI; extends randomized evidence to this population.
AIMS: The LEADERS FREE trial has demonstrated that a polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stent (BA9-DCS) is superior to a bare metal stent (BMS) for high bleeding risk (HBR) patients when treated with one month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This analysis aimed to determine the impact of PCI procedure complexity on the two-year results. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-seven (667) patients enrolled in the LEADERS FREE (BA9-DCS 346, BMS 321) underwent a complex PCI, defined by one or more of eight characteristics: total stent length ≥60 mm, ≥3 vessels or lesions treated, ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation lesion treated with ≥2 stents, chronically occluded, restenotic or saphenous vein graft lesion. Patients undergoing complex PCI were older, more often male, and presented with more ACS, diabetes, renal insufficiency, anaemia and multivessel disease. They derived major benefit from DCS over BMS for safety (16.2% vs. 21.7%, HR 0.70 [0.49-0.99], p<0.05) and for efficacy (10.8% vs. 18.1%, HR 0.54 [0.35-0.83], p<0.005). For the 1,746 patients with non-complex PCI, DCS demonstrated superior efficacy (5.3% vs. 9.9%, HR 0.52 [0.36-0.75], p<0.001, p for interaction NS) and similar safety to BMS (11.1% vs. 12.6%, NS, p for interaction NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to BMS, the BA9-DCS maintained both efficacy and safety benefits when used in complex PCI procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lipiecki et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in High bleeding risk requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,413). Biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stent (BA9-DCS) vs. Bare metal stent (BMS) was evaluated on Composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite or probable stent thrombosis (primary safety endpoint) (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99, p=<0.05). The Biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stent reduced the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis (HR 0.70) compared to a bare metal stent in complex PCI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: