Key result
An HFA-PEFF score ≥5 failed to independently predict cardiovascular mortality (aHR 1.37) or heart failure-related rehospitalization over 24 months in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI.
Why the study?
The HFA-PEFF score may help predict long-term outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF.
Does a high HFA-PEFF score predict long-term mortality and adverse heart failure-related events in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,022)
No
Does a high HFA-PEFF score predict long-term mortality and adverse heart failure-related events in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI?
Hazard Ratio: 1.37 (95% CI 0.9–2.08)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 7.7%
p-value: p=0.140
The HFA-PEFF score showed limited independent value in predicting long-term cardiovascular mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI.
HFA-PEFF ≥5 should not guide prognosis or management in preserved-EF TAVI; leaves open whether refined scores improve risk stratification.
Background The HFA-PEFF score may help in predicting long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). Methods We retrieved data from 1,332 patients undergoing TAVI between 2010 and 2019 from the Prospective Segeberg TAVI Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192774). We calculated the HFA-PEFF score for 1,022 patients who had preserved EF (≥50%). To assess the prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score in predicting adverse events, we dichotomised the patients according to a cut-off score of five (score <5 group: n=528 (51.6%), score ≥5 group: n=494 (48.3%)). Results The HFA-PEFF score ≥5 groups were older (81.9±6.3 years vs. 80.3±6.9 years; p<0.001) and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (35.1% vs 20.8%; p<0.001) and chronic kidney disease (30.1% vs 26.1%; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses over 24 months showed increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality (12.5% vs. 7.7%, log-rank; p=0.028) and first heart failure-related rehospitalisation (7.7% vs. 4.0%, log-rank p=0.014) in the HFA-PEFF score ≥5 groups compared with those of lower scores. No significant difference in all-cause mortality between both groups was observed (22.0% vs. 17.9%, log-rank p=0.127). In multivariate analysis, HFA-PEFF score ≥5 failed to predict CV mortality (aHR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.90-2.08, p=0.140) and time to first heart failure-related rehospitalisation (aHR 1.49, 95% CI: 0.83-2.65, p=0.181). Conclusion The HFA-PEFF score showed limited value in predicting long-term mortality and adverse heart failure-related events in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI. Clinical variables specific to this population could complement the HFA-PEFF score for better risk prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alotaibi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction (n=1,022). HFA-PEFF score ≥5 vs. HFA-PEFF score <5 was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 0.90-2.08, p=0.140). An HFA-PEFF score ≥5 failed to independently predict cardiovascular mortality (aHR 1.37) or heart failure-related rehospitalization over 24 months in patients with preserved EF undergoing TAVI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: