PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2010Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System12 citationsOpen Access

Simultaneous administration of Ang(1-7) or A-779 does not affect the chronic hypertensive effects of angiotensin II in normal rats

JCJohn P. CollisterDNDavid Nahey

Key Result

Co-administration of either Ang(1-7) or A-779 did not alter the chronic hypertensive effects of Ang II in normal rats, with mean arterial pressure rising 25-30 mmHg in all groups over 8 days.

Structured PICO

Does simultaneous administration of Ang(1-7) or A-779 affect the chronic hypertensive effects of angiotensin II in normal rats?

P
Population
24 normal rats treated with Ang II alone or co-administered with Ang(1-7) or A-779 for 8 days.
I
Intervention
Angiotensin II (10 ng/kg/min) co-administered with either Ang(1-7) (24 microg/kg/h) or the Ang(1-7) antagonist A-779 (24 microg/kg/h) for 8 days
C
Comparator
Angiotensin II (10 ng/kg/min) alone for 8 days
O
Outcome
Mean arterial pressure response over 8 dayssurrogate

Co-administration of Ang(1-7) or its antagonist A-779 does not alter the chronic hypertensive effects of angiotensin II in normal rats.

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The following studies were designed to test the hypothesis that simultaneous administration of either Ang(1-7) or its antagonist A-779 would affect the chronic hypertensive effects of angiotensin II (Ang II). INTRODUCTION: Despite the well-described actions of Ang(1-7) and its role possessing opposite actions to Ang II, there have been few studies examining the role of Ang(1-7) in a chronic setting. It is well established that Ang(1-7) plays a protective role in preventing deleterious effects of Ang II in the heart, but little is known of its role in modulating the chronic hypertensive effects of Ang II. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were instrumented with venous catheters and telemetric pressure transducers. Arterial pressure responses were measured in rats treated with Ang II (10 ng/kg/ min) (n=9) and compared with those treated with Ang II and Ang(1-7) (24 microg/kg/h) (n=8), or the Ang(1-7) antagonist A-779 (24 microg/kg/h) (n=7) for 8 days. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure rose significantly and similarly in all three groups of rats, such that by day 8 of Ang II infusion, pressures had risen 25-30 mmHg in all rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the hypothesis that the chronic hypertensive effects of Ang II in normal rats are altered by co-administration of either Ang(1-7) or A-779.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Collister et al. (2010) studied Ang II-induced hypertension (n=24). Ang(1-7) or A-779 vs. Ang II alone was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure. Co-administration of either Ang(1-7) or A-779 did not alter the chronic hypertensive effects of Ang II in normal rats, with mean arterial pressure rising 25-30 mmHg in all groups over 8 days.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b46e4a00abbd10d11815https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320309359928
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper