Key result
Patient-specific simulation of coronary artery pressure using finite element computations showed high correlation with wire-based measurements (r² ranging between 0.8902 and 0.9961).
Why the study?
Does computational assessment of coronary pressure accurately correlate with invasive wire-based measurements in human coronary arteries?
Population
6 patients (8 coronary arteries) undergoing coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements
Comparison
Computed distal coronary pressure using finite… vs Measured distal coronary pressure using a combo…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Supports noninvasive coronary pressure assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Observational (n=6)
Does computational assessment of coronary pressure accurately correlate with invasive wire-based measurements in human coronary arteries?
Effect estimate: r2 0.8902-0.9961
Computational assessment of coronary pressure using 3D reconstruction and finite element analysis is feasible and highly accurate compared to invasive wire-based measurements.
Siogkas et al. (2015) reported an observational. Patient-specific simulation of coronary artery pressure vs. Wire-based pressure measurements was evaluated on Correlation between measured and computed coronary pressure values (r2 0.8902-0.9961). Patient-specific simulation of coronary artery pressure using finite element computations showed high correlation with wire-based measurements (r² ranging between 0.8902 and 0.9961).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: