Key result
RVP induces electrical dyssynchrony in ~86% of patients, with >20% burden linked to cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Long-term right ventricular pacing is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and cardiomyopathy, but the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear.
Does right ventricular pacing cause ventricular dyssynchrony and short-term heart failure or cardiomyopathy in patients receiving permanent pacemakers?
Cohort (n=36)
No
Does right ventricular pacing cause ventricular dyssynchrony and short-term heart failure or cardiomyopathy in patients receiving permanent pacemakers?
High-burden right ventricular pacing (>20%) is associated with short-term development of cardiomyopathy and heart failure, although echocardiographic mechanical dyssynchrony itself does not predict these early clinical declines.
High-burden RV pacing was associated with early cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating for prospective trials of pacing minimization in new recipients.
Objective: Long-term right ventricular pacing has been associated with an increased risk of heart failure and cardiomyopathy. The pathophysiology of cardiomyopathy associated with right ventricular pacing remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the burden and short-term outcomes of ventricular dyssynchrony after immediate permanent pacemaker implantation. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study examined consecutive patients who had permanent pacemaker implantation at Vajira Hospital in 2019. Left ventricular systolic function, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and echocardiographic ventricular dyssynchrony parameters were assessed. The endpoints included the prevalence of ventricular dyssynchrony, new-onset cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and death. The correlation between QRS complex duration, the burden of ventricular pacing, and echocardiographic ventricular dyssynchrony was measured. Results: Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent pacemaker implantation. The prevalence of mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony was 22.2% using the interventricular conduction delay method, 41.7% using LV pre-ejection period method, and 11.1% using the septal posterior wall motion abnormality method. Electrical ventricular dyssynchrony was 86.1% and new-onset cardiomyopathy was 17.1% after 3 months of permanent pacemaker implantation. The right ventricular pacing of more than 20% was significantly associated with cardiomyopathy (p < 0.022) and heart failure (log-rank, p = 0.049) within 3 months. But heart failure was not associated with mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony parameters (log-rank, p = 0.610; hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 - 7.96; p = 0.613 for IVMD and log-rank, p = 0.398; HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 - 3316.7 for SPWMD). Conclusion: Mechanical and electrical ventricular dyssynchrony are common findings in right ventricular pacing. High-burden right ventricular pacing after 3 months of permanent pacemaker implantation is often associated with cardiomyopathy and heart failure, but mechanical and electrical ventricular dyssynchrony does not predict a short-term decline in left ventricular systolic function and heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aritajati et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Ventricular dyssynchrony and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (n=36). Permanent right ventricular pacing vs. Unexposed / Low-burden RV pacing was evaluated on Prevalence of electrical ventricular dyssynchrony. Permanent right ventricular pacing resulted in a high prevalence of electrical (86.1%) and mechanical (22.2%) dyssynchrony, and a pacing burden >20% was significantly associated with early-onset cardiomyopathy (p<0.022) within 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: