Key result
Type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly increased risk of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (adjusted HR 1.32) compared to matched controls.
Why the study?
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of severe tachyarrhythmias, but whether CIED treatment rates differ compared to patients without diabetes was unclear.
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the risk of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to the general population?
Cohort (n=2,497,249)
Yes
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the risk of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to the general population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.32 (95% CI 1.21–1.45)
Absolute Event Rate: 30.3% vs 14.3%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Patients with type 2 diabetes have a significantly higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and a greater need for ICD and CRT device therapy compared to the general population, independent of coronary artery disease and heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Increased risk of severe tachyarrhythmias is reported in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to explore if treatment with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) such as implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy- pacemaker and -defibrillator (CRT-P/CRT-D) differed in patients with vs. without T2DM. A secondary aim was to identify patient characteristics indicating an increased CIED treatment. METHOD: 416 162 adult patients with T2DM from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry and 2 081 087 controls from the Swedish population, matched for age, sex and living area, were included between 1/1/1998 and 31/12/2012 and followed until 31/12/2013. They were compared regarding prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) at baseline and the risk of receiving a CIED during follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of CIED-treatment and factors identifying patients with such risk. RESULTS: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) (0.1% vs 0.0004%) and (VT) (0.2% vs. 0.1%) were more frequent among patients with T2DM compared to controls. CIED-treatment was significantly increased in patients with T2DM both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. HR and 95% CI, after adjustment for sex, age, marital status, income, education, country of birth, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure, were 1.32 [1.21-1.45] for ICD, 1.74 [1.55-1.95] for CRT-P and 1.69 [1.43-1.99] for CRT-D. Blood-pressure and lipid lowering therapies were independent risk factors associated to receiving CIED, while female sex was protective. CONCLUSIONS: Although the proportion of VT/VF was low, patients with T2DM had a higher prevalence of these conditions and increased risk for treatment with CIED compared to controls. This underlines the importance of recognizing that T2DM patients have an increased need of CIED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rautio et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2,497,249). Type 2 diabetes mellitus vs. Age- and sex-matched controls without diabetes was evaluated on De novo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21-1.45, p=<0.0001). Type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly increased risk of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (adjusted HR 1.32) compared to matched controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: